Character Theft? You
decide!
Have you ever stolen someones work? Is it right or wrong? You decide! |
Dave Alvarez created his Kike Koki back in 2005. |
November 19th, 2012 I went onto facebook and I was smacked
in the face by an image about Kike Koki vs. Kiki Koki and how the one created
was being ripped off and which showed how another creator had benefited
in this theft, while the original creator was struggling to make ends meet.
Kike Koki created by Dave Alvarez in 2005. |
Kike Koki 2005. |
This is Ed Rodriguez. Behind him is one of the plush toys based on his Kiki Koki. |
So when I did this research I was totally with Dave Alvarez
at this point because the two characters at first glance of course don’t look
like carbon copies but if you look at the two side by side you have to measure
it equally with weighted eyes. Of course I am no judge, but my perception of
the matter makes me suspect deeply that Ed stole Dave’s character.
Let’s do a side by side comparison and you can decide:
Do you see how both characters share a similar name, and share a similar appearance? You decide! |
The original Kike Koki. |
Kike Koki vs. Kiki Koki
Kike: Is a Coqui.
Kiki: Is a Coqui
Kike: Has bug eyes.
Kiki: Has bug eyes.
Kike: The color is yellow, white, green and red.
Kiki: The color is yellow, white, green and red.
Kike: Kike Coqui
Kiki: Kiki Coqui
You get my drift here? There are way to many similarities here
because they both share a similar name, the same appearance and someone that
say followed Dave’s character caught the Kiki Coqui book, they would just assume
it was the same character, and this would cause brand confusion. Yet the buck
doesn’t stop there at all.
See how similar Kike is to Kiki? |
You’d think if the creator of Kiki Koki was told this that
he would have altered the character further that there would be zero
similarities. I had to contact the creator of Kiki Koki about this. This is
what I initially said to the creator in a message over on YouTube.
Yo if this is a rip off of an established character, not cool.
Hey Jake
There is no rip off
here. Coquí frogs are golden in color (search Coqui Dorado) and koki is the
Taino spelling for Coqui. Check out Kike Koki for yourself and compare it toKiki
Koki, outside of color there is no similarity in design, content and story.
Then I email him, I asked him to clarify his stance further
and this is what he tells me in his email:
Here is Ed explaining to me why his character is not a rip-off. You decide! |
Hi Jake.
Ed Rodriguez's Kiki Koki as a plush figure. |
Congratulations on
your blog and Comic books. Best of luck on printing your book. I have some
experience in that area, I would be happy to share any lessons I've learned
along the way if you have any specific questions.
As far as the
"controversy" I really don't have anything further to say about it.
Thanks
Ed
You see it there; he then takes off right as he started the
email. He did not defend himself further, he figured by giving me that wimpy
excuse that he wasn’t a rip off because Coqui frogs are golden in color, and
that Koki is the Taino spelling for Coqui, and tells me to compare it for
myself, which I did they look a lot alike. Sure the stories maybe different but
they look alike.
The creator with the faux Kiki? You decide! |
At first when I heard this story I thought what if this guy
didn’t know about the other guys creation and he went on to create his own
story using the Coqui and the particular color scheme came about, but that
thought quickly diminished with that particular response he made directly to
me.
Furthermore, I spoke with Dave directly myself, and he told
me that he did indeed confront Ed Rodriguez and told him that he was infringing
on his characters branding and he showed him what he had, and he was told that
he would stop with the character but that never happened because Ed was backed
up by a Agent and to much money was invested into the character at this point? Dave,
was dismayed because he said that Kiki was infringing on his character Kike,
creating branding confusion and he was losing money because of this and he had
to stop it. He told me he was consulting with an attorney.
You see Ed's success, is this right? Or is it wrong? You decide! |
If you go look at the Kiki Koki website you will see that Ed
Rodriguez has made shirts, plus toys, had stage plays and cartoons using this
character. Ed Rodriguez has committed fraud and he continues to commit such
fraud, and hoping that Dave Alvarez is gullible enough to do nothing about it.
That is only my opinion, and I do hope and pray that Dave is smart enough and
he defends his property. He must because if he leaves this unchallenged then Ed
will continue to abuse this mans creation.
Look it over folks, make your own informed opinion and share
this story on. Thank you.
Jake Estrada
Son of a...
ReplyDeletei so want to curse right now
i may not 'know' Dave A.
but i have seen his work
and he has been trying his darnest to make a career with his Creations
we have seen him try to rise and with some success
but then i see this...
Initially i did believe that this was just a simple characters had 'similar names'. I can't say it happens All the time but things like this DO pop up
but taking close looks at both characters they are similarities, such as the bow tie on Kike and the red amulet on Kiki.
i think what may 'Be' happening is similar to...-sigh-
an episode to icarly
in the episode a major company starts airing a program that is similar to the web show 'icarly' just redubing the names of the characters and sketches so as to not sound like they are taking the web shows ideas
i do believe Dave is the original Creator of this cute frog...hehe koki
and wish with all my strength that he do something about this
i wish the law on your side Dave
Luis, I agree. I pray that Dave takes this all the way, in the end he has to stand up to this kind of abuse and fight for what is right.
ReplyDeleteif dave does not stop him now ... how long before this guy becomes "imaginative"with other of our local characters ???
ReplyDeleteThat's exactly it. Dave, has continued the good fight, and is trying to mount a good offensive to the issue. Hopefully there is some traction on this case soon.
ReplyDelete